Home / Media / Article


June 21 2018

Independent Women's Forum Joins Coalition Supporting Efforts to Modernize Regulations on Broadcaster Programming

featuring Victoria Coley

Today, 23 center-right consumer advocates sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission supporting its efforts to modernize regulations on broadcaster programming. The Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative will allow American broadcasters more flexibility in determining the schedule and content of children's programming.

As the coalition notes, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) "Kid Vid" rules are obsolete in our current media landscape. Most households in the United States have ready access to cable and internet services in the home and these broadcast regulations only limit the quality of children's programming.

This letter endorsing the initiative went to the FCC this morning June 21st, 2018:

June 21, 2018

The Honorable Ajit Pai
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20554

Dear Chairman Pai

On behalf of our organizations, we write to express our support of the Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative to update obsolete Federal Communications Commission (FCC) “Kid Vid” rules on children's television programming.

In 1990, the Children's Television Act (CTA) became law, and simply required broadcasters to show educational and informational programming for children. It had no mention of hourly quotas or restrictions on broadcasters and children's educational programming.  Since its passage, however, the FCC has broadly interpreted its ability to micromanage broadcaster content for children.

Broadcasters should have more flexibility in organizing their schedules for children's TV shows. The current regulations on broadcasters control the length of educational content. While some messages and programs for certain age groups are better suited for 15 minutes, others might be better suited for 30 or 45 minutes. These restrictions block modern versions of the still popular educational short animated skits from Schoolhouse Rock!, like “I’m Just a Bill,” and special programming, such as the “ABC Afterschool Specials.” Both would be unacceptable under Kid Vid. Broadcasters should have more discretion in the timing, length, and content of children’s programming.

The FCC Kid Vid rules require broadcasters to submit mountains of paperwork detailing their programming schedules, the objectives of the programming, and the target child audience. The program run-time is restricted and, once submitted, the schedules cannot vary.

The FCC’s Kid Vid rules do not contemplate the vast amount of children’s programming that is now available. There have been significant changes since the 90s, particularly in terms of access to new content delivery platforms. In previous decades, broadcasters were the primary access point, but now the vast majority of American households have more options.  According to Nielsen, there are only 2.5% of households without cable or internet access in the home. Of those homes, only 20% have a child between the ages of two and 17. That leaves only .5% of households with children that don’t have cable or internet in the home, but individuals in these homes may be accessing content like the PBS app on their wireless devices.

In terms of content, there are many cable tv stations dedicated to children's programming. Parents have access to streaming services, like Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Go, to watch children's educational content on demand with their families on any device anywhere.

Easing these regulations does not mean the end of children's broadcast programming; rather, it enables broadcasters to enhance the quality of children’s programming to match their competitors.

The initial law did not require the restrictions that have since been imposed on broadcasters. We support easing broadcaster regulations to match the contemporary children’s programming environment.

 

Regards,

 

Grover G. Norquist

President

Americans for Tax Reform

 

Phil Kerpen

President

American Commitment

 

Matt Schlapp

Chairman

American Conservative Union

 

Brent Wm. Gardner

Chief Government Affairs Officer

Americans for Prosperity

 

Steve Pociask

President

American Consumer Institute

Center for Citizen Research

 

Lisa B. Nelson

Chief Executive Officer

American Legislative Exchange Council

 

Ashley N. Varner

Executive Director

ALEC Action

 

Norm Singleton

President

Campaign for Liberty

 

Thomas Schatz

President

Citizens Against Government Waste

 

Andrew F. Quinlan

President

Center for Freedom and Prosperity

 

Jeffery Mazzella

President

Center for Individual Freedom

 

Matthew Kandrach

President

Consumer Action for a Strong America

 

Katie McAuliffe

Executive Director

Digital Liberty

 

Hance Haney

Senior Fellow

Discovery Institute

 

Adam Brandon

President

FreedomWorks Foundation

 

George Landrith

President

Frontiers of Freedom

 

Mario H. Lopez

President

Hispanic Leadership Fund

 

Carrie Lukas

President

Independent Women’s Forum

 

Andrew Langer

President

Institute for Liberty

 

Bartlett Cleland

Managing Principal

Madery Bridge

 

Pete Sepp

President

National Taxpayers’ Union

 

Scott Cleland

Chairman

NetCompetition

 

David Williams

President

Taxpayer Protection Alliance

 

 

Go Back

Independent Women's Forum is an educational 501(c)(3) dedicated to developing and advancing policies that aren’t just well intended, but actually enhance people’s freedom, choices, and opportunities. IWF is the sister organization of the Independent Women’s Voice.​
Follow us