News & Commentary

Don't Celebrate Equal Pay Day; Celebrate Economic Opportunity

Townhall.com

Happy Equal Pay Day!  You'll have to forgive your friends for not sending a card-Hallmark has yet to recognize fabricated feminist holidays based on misleading data.

Overshadowed by legitimate spring holidays such as Easter and Memorial Day, Equal Pay Day celebrates, or rather mourns, the day in which women have worked off the "wage gap" from the previous year.  The wage gap refers to the much-hyped statistic that women only earn 78 cents for every dollar a man earns.  Discrimination is the implied culprit.  Unfortunately for Equal Pay Day enthusiasts, the wage gap tells us nothing about the existence or nonexistence of workplace discrimination.

The wage gap-a real statistic measured by the Department of Labor-simply compares the median wage of the full-time working woman versus the median wage of the full-time working man.  It is a single-variable statistic that fails to account for a variety of factors that affect compensation levels, including number of hours worked,  education level, years of relevant experience, and type of occupation (just to name a few).  Once these other factors are taken into account, the wage gap shrinks away.  Even liberal groups such as the American Association of University Women (AAUW), who support efforts to counter the wage gap, admit that over three quarters of the wage gap is explained by factors other than discrimination.

Far from a crisis, the difference in median wages can be chalked up to different preferences and lifestyle choices.  A mother, for example, who takes time out of the workforce to care for an infant or elderly family member likely decreases her future earning potential and therefore contributes to the wage gap.  Ditto the mother who gives up higher wages for a more flexible work arrangement to assist with her childcare needs.  So do women who forgo a high-paying career in laboratory science for a more social or family-friendly work environment that pays less, but is more personally rewarding for them.   Each of these individual choices, which are perfectly rational for that unique person's situation, contributes to the aggregate wage gap.

The choices that men make matter too.  The truth is that more men, on average, are willing to take on jobs that are dirty, dangerous, and distasteful to most women.  Men's willingness to perform more dangerous jobs is one of the reasons that more than nine out of ten workplace deaths is of a male worker.  Why would men take on such risks?  To make more money.  Men also work more hours per week, on average, than full-time working women do.  Again, add all these factors up and you get a wage gap.  It's hardly cause for concern, let alone a holiday.

Unfortunately, that doesn't stop many politicians and interest groups from exploiting the wage gap to advance their own agenda. Just this spring we've seen several pieces of legislation, including the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, justified as needed to help "fix the wage gap" and ensure equal pay for equal work.

Voters should see past this political hyperbole.  If the wage gap is based on individual's lifestyle decisions, it doesn't need "fixing."  And in fact, many of the ways that lawmakers would try to "fix" the wage gap would create worse problems for the economy writ large, as well as for individual men and women.  Some feminists have suggested that we go so far as to give government a greater role in determining compensation levels for individual jobs, so that they can correct for what they see as the flawed marketplace that ends up paying men more.  Yet it is easy to imagine the political nightmare such a regime would become, with lobbyists descending on federal decision-makers to convince them of the value provided by their group of employees.  There would be shortages in some professions which have been undervalued by bureaucrats and oversupply in others.   We would have a less flexible, less dynamic labor market-exactly what workers do not need or want.

Ultimately such fixes are unnecessary.  Equal pay for equal work has been the law in America since the Equal Pay Act of 1963.  We don't need new laws to reach that end; we are already there.  American workers-women and men alike-are blessed to live in a country where one's sex is not a barrier to entry for any job or industry.  Now that is a cause worth celebrating.

Allison Kasic is director of the R. Gaull Silberman Center for Collegiate Studies at the Independent Women's Forum.

4 Comments

Jim | April 29, 2009, 9:30pm | #

The Society for Human Resources Management put out a study in the mid 90's that showed the average starting salary for women compared to the average starting salary for men doing the same jobs was actually about 3% higher. I worked in HR for 20 years and never saw any pay disparity that could not be explained by the various factors the author talks about. The pay gap is total bunk or a choice based on chosen field of work or lifestyle.

Proud Feminist | April 30, 2009, 6:42am | #

Are you kidding me? You are like an Uncle Tom of Women. I'm a single educated woman. I have no kids, I live alone in my own home, I take care of myself and work long hours just like my male counterparts in my field. I have a right to be paid equally as my male counterparts. If in the future I was to choose to have children, I still deserve to be paid equally as my male counterparts due to the fact, being a mother is a full time, around the clock job. There's no pay. I shouldn't be given low pay, when I'm a mother. If as a working mother, I'm able to deliver and meet the company's goals and then some, surpass profit expectations and then some, I deserve to be paid equally as my male counterparts. How dare you talk about working mothers like that lady? Without the feminist movement, you would not even be on this forum.

Guy | April 30, 2009, 6:01pm | #

So you believe your employer should compensate you for taking time out to have kids? Are you kidding? You are paid for your experience, knowledge, and ability. When you take out time from your career, you no longer have the exprience, knowl;edge, or ability of a coworker that didn't take that time off. Why should an employer be forced to take on the burden of paying you for being a "lesser" employee than somebody else? Suppose someobdy else wants to take 5 years away from their career to go be a missionary, a noble cause, should the employer consider this individual to be "equal" to another employee that gained useful experience and increased his ability to be productive in his field during those 5 years? You need to be realisitic and stop the communist mantra you are delusionally living by that everybody is "equal" in every way.

Nancy | May 1, 2009, 3:46pm | #

Wage disparities are not a prima-facie case for discrimination. Asian American males make more on average than white American males. Married men make more on average than unmarried men. Are we to conclude that this is discrimination against white males and unmarried males? Or is there some other explanation for the wage differential. Proud Feminist needs to think with her head; not her heart. If we assume that firms are interested in profits, then a profit maximizing firm would hire a woman at 78 cents rather than a man at 1 dollar. The result would be much higher male unemployment.

Comment on this article: